The primary aim of both anarchism and neoluddism is freedom, anarchists seek freedom from all types of institutions or any authority, neoluddites argue that modern technology inevitably constricts everyone within the system to rules and regulations that infringe on personal freedoms more and more as technology advances. The old luddites opposed technology because it outcompeted them in 19th century capitalistic English labor markets, contrarily, new (or neo) luddites oppose all modern technology. So why not support anarcho-primitivism? They advocate for the abolition of all technology made after the prehistoric era, including agriculture. cuz limited food variety, disease from crowding n animals, class and sex inequality
hi lmao